THE EU-PROJECT RISE:  USE OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION TO RESTORE STANDING
IN PARAPLEGICSWITH LONG-TERM DENERVATED DEGENERATED MUSCLES (DDM)

 

W. Mayr1, H. Kern2, C. Hofer2, J. Jarvis3, S. Salmons3

 

1 Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, University of Vienna, Austria

2 L.-Boltzmann-Inst. of Electrical Stimulation and Physical Rehabilitation, Dept. of
Physical Medicine, Wilhelminenspital,
Vienna, Austria

3 Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Liverpool, UK

 

SUMMARY

 

The article describes the project RISE that was selected for funding by the European Community FP5 program. The project start is expected for October/November 2001.

A novel clinical rehabilitation method for patients suffering from long-term flaccid paraplegia (denervated degenerated muscles - DDM) with no chance of recovery of the nervous system, will be developed. It will restore their muscle fibres (and mass), muscle function (tetanic contractions, weight bearing) and thus their ability to rise (’standing up’) and maintain a standing posture (’standing’). Based on the results of animal experiments on rabbit and pig and initial clinical trials the associated technology will be developed and an application for modification of EU-standards is planned. It will provide European industry with a novel product. The method addresses the needs of about 100 patients per million EU inhabitants.

 

STATE OF THE ART

 

Current practice in the clinical treatment of patients suffering from muscle denervation and degeneration is unsatisfactory (Fig. 1). There is no adequate rehabilitation method for patients with long-term denervated degenerated muscles (DDM), caused by peripheral nerve lesions (plexus paresis, conus cauda lesion, poliomyelitis, multiple sclerosis, etc.).


Text Box:  Text Box:

Fig. 1:   CT-scans through the mid-quadriceps region of the thigh of two different paraplegic patients,

about 4 years post-injury.

Left    - of a patient with a conus cauda lesion,

right   - of a patient with a spastic lesion


 


The use of electrical stimulation for denervated muscles is still considered to be controversial by many rehabilitation facilities and medical professionals. This is largely because current teaching and training for therapists is still based on the scientific and technological knowledge of the fifties and sixties.

There are few basic scientific studies relevant to FES treatment of DDM in the literature and the potential for this technique is not generally appreciated within rehabilitation facilities.

The literature contains a limited number of studies of the effects of long-term stimulation on denervated muscles in the rat and rabbit. These have been designed mainly to address basic scientific issues
[Lit. 1, Lit. 2]. In virtually every case the muscles were denervated only for a short time before stimulation is commenced, and the results therefore have limited relevance to this human condition, in which long-standing denervation has already resulted in severe atrophy and degeneration of muscle fibres. Other experimental work has been concerned mainly with strategies for reinnervation. A clinical study by Eichhorn et al. has, however, shown that degen­eration after denervation could be slowed down, even with less than optimal equipment [Lit. 4].

Although there is a substantial literature concerning the electrical stimulation of paralysed muscle, there are only few published studies that are directly relevant to muscles that are also denervated.

One study showed that FES delivered via implanted electrodes could maintain the action of the denervated sheep cricoarytenoid muscle for up to 18 months [Lit. 3]. Only two functional clinical studies have been published. Valencic et al. have demonstrated correction of dropped foot by FES of the denervated tibialis anterior muscle [Lit. 5]. The other study, conducted by Kern et al., is the basis for the project. Preliminary experiments were conducted on 3 patients with complete injury of conus and cauda equina at spinal level T12 / L1, and motor and sensory loss in both legs. The study showed that the problems of muscle training and restoration of basic lower extremity movements in cases of flaccid paraplegia could be solved in principle, but also highlighted some of the problems that must be overcome before the technique could be used in clinical practice [Lit. 6]. The training regime was based on trial and error. It took more than 2 years to achieve muscle strength and endurance and 2 hours stimulation, delivered twice a day. This burden is unacceptable to most patients.

To create more acceptable protocols, we need to acquire a better understanding of the features of the training regime that induce muscle regeneration and that improve and maintain endurance and force. We also need to establish safe limits for stimulation. These and other open questions are to be addressed systematically in the project.

Technical equipment for FES treatment of DDM is not available commercially, and the current EU standards for medical stimulators are not appropriate for this application. We believe that it is possible to use stimulators safely at higher current densities than those specified within the EU regulations. Safety in use will be a paramount consideration in the development of the new equipment. The work will be used as a basis for revising existing regulatory standards, so that effective stimulators can be made available commercially for clinical use.

 

OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED ACHIEVEMENTS

 

Objective 1: To create a systematic body of basic scientific knowledge about the restorative effects of electrical stimulation on muscles that have undergone degeneration through long-standing denervation.

Objective 2: To use this knowledge base to design an optimised protocol for the therapeutic use of electrical stimulation to treat denervated degenerated muscles (DDM) in patients. The protocol for home use must be effective but must not intrude excessively into the patient’s normal daily activities.

Objective 3: To assemble a scientific basis for revising existing EU Regulations governing the use of electrical stimulation, which currently exclude the possibility of therapeutic use in patients with DDM.

Objective 4: To design, construct, and bring to the point of commercial adoption, equipment that will enable patients to use the new therapeutic stimulation protocol safely and effectively in their own homes.

Objective 5: To design, construct, and assess the value of new diagnostic and measurement equipment (dynamometry, surface accelerometry, recording of M-wave) for monitoring the progress of the therapy during the periodic assessment of patients in the clinic.

Expected achievements:

To illustrate the way in which this study may be expected to lead to patient benefits it will be convenient to examine a typical case history.

A patient suffered a conus cauda lesion with peripheral denervation in the gluteal region and lower limbs. After the accident he was operated for stabilization of the spine at T11 – L 1. After one week he was transferred to the rehabilitation centre for spinal cord injury. Following wound healing he was instructed in bladder and bowel management, given training in the use of a wheel chair and in prevention of pressure sores. After 4-6 months he was released from hospital to his home and family. There was little adaptation of his home and no professional re-integration. He was left to his own resources to manage daily living. Information was available to him about training for the muscles of his upper body, but not for his denervated gluteus and limb muscles.

After 2 months he developed a pressure sore and had to be undergo plastic surgery with transfer of a musculocutaneous flap and resection of the ischial tuberosity. Post-operatively he was required to lay on his stomach for 4 – 6 months.

He then heard about electrical stimulation and began to seek information at a specialized clinic. He was anxious to prevent a recurrence of pressure sores and to acquire a more acceptable cosmetic appearance of his legs during swimming exercise. He was accepted into the stimulation program.

Now, 3 years later, he stimulates his muscles for about 30 min a day, stands up 20 times a day by means of electrical stimulation, and is satisfied with the normal appearance of his leg muscles. He feels fit, does not get breathless when propelling his wheelchair uphill, and although he fell from the wheelchair during a transfer he did not break any bones. His skin is in good condition and he is not troubled by pressure sores during his daily and professional activities.

 

PROJECT WORKPLAN

 

The objectives will be achieved through an experimental programme conducted in rabbits, pig and man. The rabbit is the animal of choice for establishing most quickly and economically the conditions for safe and effective stimulation, protocols for training and maintenance, and the most appropriate outcome measures. The results will be used to refine protocols for testing in the pig, an animal whose musculature is physically more similar to that of man. Equipment, such as the stimulator devices and electrodes, will be evaluated and modified in the course of the animal experiments. The equipment and protocols will be transferred to the clinic for trials to be conducted in patients. Any problems that arise at this stage will be addressed through further animal experiments.

The Project is organised as 5 interdisciplinary workpackages which will interact closely. Each workpackage has its own director. Within a given workpackage specialists are responsible for important modules such as developing special technical equipment, performing an experiment, or conducting laboratory investigations. The Gantt chart (Fig. 2) shows the time plan of the whole project, divided into workpackages, and the approximate timing within the workpackages.

REFERENCES

 

1.  Gundersen, K. Determination of muscle contractile properties: the importance of the nerve.
Acta Physiol Scand 162: 333-341, 1998.

2.  Mokrusch, T., A. Engelhardt, K. Eichhorn, G. Prischenk, H. Prischenk, G. Sack, and B. Neundorfer. Effects of long-impulse electrical stimulation on atrophy and fibre type composi­tion of chronically denervated fast rabbit muscle. J Neurol 237: 29-34, 1990.

3.  U.Carraro, C. Catani, L. Saggin, M. Zrunek, M. Scabolcs, H. Gruber, W. Streinzer, W. Mayr,
H. Thoma: Isomyosin changes after functional electrostimulation of denervated sheep muscle. Muscle Nerve 11: 1016-1028, 1988.

4.  Eichhorn K., Schubert W., David E.: Maintenance, training and functional use of denervated muscles. J Biomed Eng 6: 205-211, 1984.

5.  Valencic V., Vodovnik L., Stefancic M., Jelnikar T.: Improved motor response due to chronic electrical stimulation of denervated tibialis anterior muscle in humans. Muscle Nerve 9: 612-617, 1986.

6.  H. Kern, C. Hofer, M. Strohhofer, W. Mayr, W. Richter and H. Stöhr: Standing up with denervated muscles in humans using functional electrical stimulation. Artif Organs 23(5):447-452, 1999.

 

AUTHOR´S ADDRESS

 

Dr. Winfried Mayr

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics

AKH, Ebene 4/L, Waehringer Guertel 18-20

A-1090 Vienna, Austria

E-mail: w.mayr@bmtp.akh.wien.ac.at